legeros.com > Movie Hell > Letters > Letters |
------------------------------------------------------------------- Letters to Hell - June, 1998 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Contents ======== - What the Hell Were You Thinking? - Attention Deficit - Colorful Question - This Fine Actor - Little More Sound-Proofing - The Planet's Biggest Video Store - Would Rather Read a Book - Typical of a Theater Dork Infringing on Moviemaking - Tinge of Relief What the Hell Were You Thinking? ================================ [ From: Marilyn in Austrialia ] [ Re: ON DEADLY GROUND ] > Here is my problem: you gave [Stephen Seagal's] ON DEADLY GROUND > an F. What the hell were you thinking? [ Not much about it, it would seem. ] Attention Deficit ================= [ From: "LoneGunMen" ] [ Re: HACKERS ] > Well... it's "hack the planet" not "hack the world." Maybe if > you'd have been paying attention, you would have given it more > than a B-. [ Maybe if it *held* my attention, it would've earned a higher grade... ] Colorful Question ================= [ From: "J" ] [ Re: LAST MAN STANDING ] > Maybe you can help me. I have a bet with someone. Was LAST MAN > STANDING with Bruce Willis in black and white? This is killing > me. Please respond. I said it might be...? [ As I recall, Walter Hill's film is sepia-toned. ] This Fine Actor =============== [ From: Marilyn ] [ Re: Art Malik ] > As I am trying to put together a Web site on this fine actor, I > was wondering if you possibly have a screen grab of him as the > grocer [in BOOTY CALL]. Any other info on Malik you might be > able to contribute would be extremely helpful and welcome. As > you can probably imagine, not much has been written about him. [ Well, nuts. I *just* deleted those BOOTY CALL screen grabs of mine... ] Little More Sound-Proofing ========================== [ From: Warren in Raleigh ] > > So far, so not-bad at the Raleigh Grand. > > I would agree with one exception. My wife attended THE HORSE > WHISPERER, and the quiet scenes in it were overwhelmed by the > sounds from GODZILLA in the adjacent theater. While this was > probably a "worst case" scenario, a little more sound-proofing > would help. Otherwise, they need to pay attention to what is > played next to what, and put the quiet films a little farther > away. After the film, when she tracked down the manager to let > him know about the problem, she had to stand in line. There were > five or six others-- all with the same complaint, waiting to bend > his ear. [ I wonder how many weeks I endured those through-the-walls rumb- lings of TITANIC at Pleasant Valley? ] Would Rather Read a Book ======================== [ From: Cara ] [ Re: Keep Up the Good Work ] > In New Zealand it's winter for six months of each year. Night- > life is shit so people eat out and go to the movies. A lot. > When they eat out, they usually talk about movies. I don't go to > the movies anymore because I usually hate them. (I would rather > read a book.) It's great that you are out there watching movies > though. It means that I can occasionally read your reviews and > keep my end up with witty comments like "DEEP IMPACT-- the end of > the world-- as a five minute tidal wave?" Followed by the happy > admission that I haven't seen the film but have read the review. > This seems to pacify others. Perhaps one day you will give a > film such a good review, I will be forced out to watch it. I am > not holding my breath. [ I'm crossing my fingers for a really good movie by this time next year... ] Typical of a Theater Dork Infringing on Moviemaking =================================================== [ From: Rich ] [ Re: THE SPANISH PRISONER ] > I didn't bother reading your review, but I have to admit that I'm > curious how anyone could give that piece of crap a B+. Mamet > sucks. Period. He is what happens when the kid who sucked at > English in high school fools people into believing he's a genius, > a phenomena that could only be fostered in a city as pretentious > as New York. The acting stank, the direction was heavy-handed, > dull and typical of a theater dork infringing on moviemaking. > Steve Martin in a trenchcoat and sunglasses, carrying a gun, > trying to look menacing. I really laughed hard at that shot, > then I got sad, because I realized it was meant to be taken > seriously. As far as the plot, you can go to Rite Aid and pick > up a paperback mystery for $3.99 with more twists and original- > ity. Anyway, good luck with your page. Try to be more original > in your opinions. This is one of those movies that has managed > to encourage bandwagon praise. I never understand how this hap- > pens, and I only care because I hate praise for non-talents like > Mamet. [ At the hour mark, I ready to walk out. At the end, I was applauding. Ain't art strange? ] Tinge of Relief =============== [ From: Mandy in Miami ] [ Re: THE HORSE WHISPERER ] > I do have to object to your mention of only two bawl-worthy > moments. I cried almost the entire time. As someone who has > read the book, I was completely unprepared for the ending-- I > thought there would be at least another 35 minutes. (May I admit > a tinge of relief not to see the wrinkling-more-each-minute Mr. > Redford rolling around without a shirt on?) Do you know if they > filmed the original ending and audiences objected-- Hollywood > being famous for fence-riding, appeasement, etc.? Or perhaps Mr. > Redford objected to the "taking home another man's son for your > husband to raise" bit? (He *was* married to a Mormon woman for > years.) I guess he can also be forgiven for the occasional > glowing shot of his and Ms. Scott Thomas's hair. I thought it > was a great film. Ms. Scott Thomas was superb as usual. Perhaps > this is not the time to take offense at your ENGLISH PATIENT re- > review? I think you should see it again... or would this amount > to some sort of medieval torture for you? [ Only if I couldn't watch Billy Crystal's Oscar-spoof immediately afterward. Good night everybody! ]