| legeros.com > Movie Hell > Letters > Letters |
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Letters to Hell - June, 1998
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Contents
========
- What the Hell Were You Thinking?
- Attention Deficit
- Colorful Question
- This Fine Actor
- Little More Sound-Proofing
- The Planet's Biggest Video Store
- Would Rather Read a Book
- Typical of a Theater Dork Infringing on Moviemaking
- Tinge of Relief
What the Hell Were You Thinking?
================================
[ From: Marilyn in Austrialia ]
[ Re: ON DEADLY GROUND ]
> Here is my problem: you gave [Stephen Seagal's] ON DEADLY GROUND
> an F. What the hell were you thinking?
[ Not much about it, it would seem. ]
Attention Deficit
=================
[ From: "LoneGunMen" ]
[ Re: HACKERS ]
> Well... it's "hack the planet" not "hack the world." Maybe if
> you'd have been paying attention, you would have given it more
> than a B-.
[ Maybe if it *held* my attention, it would've earned a higher
grade... ]
Colorful Question
=================
[ From: "J" ]
[ Re: LAST MAN STANDING ]
> Maybe you can help me. I have a bet with someone. Was LAST MAN
> STANDING with Bruce Willis in black and white? This is killing
> me. Please respond. I said it might be...?
[ As I recall, Walter Hill's film is sepia-toned. ]
This Fine Actor
===============
[ From: Marilyn ]
[ Re: Art Malik ]
> As I am trying to put together a Web site on this fine actor, I
> was wondering if you possibly have a screen grab of him as the
> grocer [in BOOTY CALL]. Any other info on Malik you might be
> able to contribute would be extremely helpful and welcome. As
> you can probably imagine, not much has been written about him.
[ Well, nuts. I *just* deleted those BOOTY CALL screen grabs of
mine... ]
Little More Sound-Proofing
==========================
[ From: Warren in Raleigh ]
> > So far, so not-bad at the Raleigh Grand.
>
> I would agree with one exception. My wife attended THE HORSE
> WHISPERER, and the quiet scenes in it were overwhelmed by the
> sounds from GODZILLA in the adjacent theater. While this was
> probably a "worst case" scenario, a little more sound-proofing
> would help. Otherwise, they need to pay attention to what is
> played next to what, and put the quiet films a little farther
> away. After the film, when she tracked down the manager to let
> him know about the problem, she had to stand in line. There were
> five or six others-- all with the same complaint, waiting to bend
> his ear.
[ I wonder how many weeks I endured those through-the-walls rumb-
lings of TITANIC at Pleasant Valley? ]
Would Rather Read a Book
========================
[ From: Cara ]
[ Re: Keep Up the Good Work ]
> In New Zealand it's winter for six months of each year. Night-
> life is shit so people eat out and go to the movies. A lot.
> When they eat out, they usually talk about movies. I don't go to
> the movies anymore because I usually hate them. (I would rather
> read a book.) It's great that you are out there watching movies
> though. It means that I can occasionally read your reviews and
> keep my end up with witty comments like "DEEP IMPACT-- the end of
> the world-- as a five minute tidal wave?" Followed by the happy
> admission that I haven't seen the film but have read the review.
> This seems to pacify others. Perhaps one day you will give a
> film such a good review, I will be forced out to watch it. I am
> not holding my breath.
[ I'm crossing my fingers for a really good movie by this time
next year... ]
Typical of a Theater Dork Infringing on Moviemaking
===================================================
[ From: Rich ]
[ Re: THE SPANISH PRISONER ]
> I didn't bother reading your review, but I have to admit that I'm
> curious how anyone could give that piece of crap a B+. Mamet
> sucks. Period. He is what happens when the kid who sucked at
> English in high school fools people into believing he's a genius,
> a phenomena that could only be fostered in a city as pretentious
> as New York. The acting stank, the direction was heavy-handed,
> dull and typical of a theater dork infringing on moviemaking.
> Steve Martin in a trenchcoat and sunglasses, carrying a gun,
> trying to look menacing. I really laughed hard at that shot,
> then I got sad, because I realized it was meant to be taken
> seriously. As far as the plot, you can go to Rite Aid and pick
> up a paperback mystery for $3.99 with more twists and original-
> ity. Anyway, good luck with your page. Try to be more original
> in your opinions. This is one of those movies that has managed
> to encourage bandwagon praise. I never understand how this hap-
> pens, and I only care because I hate praise for non-talents like
> Mamet.
[ At the hour mark, I ready to walk out. At the end, I was
applauding. Ain't art strange? ]
Tinge of Relief
===============
[ From: Mandy in Miami ]
[ Re: THE HORSE WHISPERER ]
> I do have to object to your mention of only two bawl-worthy
> moments. I cried almost the entire time. As someone who has
> read the book, I was completely unprepared for the ending-- I
> thought there would be at least another 35 minutes. (May I admit
> a tinge of relief not to see the wrinkling-more-each-minute Mr.
> Redford rolling around without a shirt on?) Do you know if they
> filmed the original ending and audiences objected-- Hollywood
> being famous for fence-riding, appeasement, etc.? Or perhaps Mr.
> Redford objected to the "taking home another man's son for your
> husband to raise" bit? (He *was* married to a Mormon woman for
> years.) I guess he can also be forgiven for the occasional
> glowing shot of his and Ms. Scott Thomas's hair. I thought it
> was a great film. Ms. Scott Thomas was superb as usual. Perhaps
> this is not the time to take offense at your ENGLISH PATIENT re-
> review? I think you should see it again... or would this amount
> to some sort of medieval torture for you?
[ Only if I couldn't watch Billy Crystal's Oscar-spoof immediately
afterward. Good night everybody! ]